Evaluating How You Identify Objectives
評鑑如何界定目標
一個顯著的目標,並發展解決具體問題確定必要地評估。
“SMART”目標是用來衡量成就以朝向一個目標,則具有以下特性:
* Measurable,可測量的
* Attainable,可達成的
* Realistic, and實際可行的
* Timebound.時限性
評鑑你的學校改善計畫目標
DECISION-MAKING:
決策
• Do your objectives emphasize positive change for your school?
你的目標是否強調轉變你的學校?
• Do your objectives provide guidance for choosing programs and strategies to implement?
你的目標是否提供指導選擇方案和實施策略?
• Are your objectives challenging yet achievable for the given timeframe?
你的目標是否尚未實現時間表內給定的挑戰?
課責
• Do objectives include measurable expectations for all student populations?
目標是否包含所有的學生群體可測量的預期?
• Is each objective aligned with a school and state goal?
是否每個目標都符應學校和國家的目標?
• Is each objective supported by data in your needs assessment?
是否每個目標都支持必要地評估資料?
• Is there an objective addressing the needs of the lowest 25% performing students in your school?
是否有一個客觀的解決方法用來解決在學校表現最後25%的學生的需要?
• Is there an objective addressing the alignment of content instruction to the Sunshine State Standards with specific attention to science?
是否對陽光標準有一個客觀的指示內容?
• If your school has been identified as performance grade D or F, is there a measurable objective identified for each low performing content area? Are these objectives aligned to the district intervention plan?
如果你的學校已被評定為D或F的表現等級,則此地區是否有一個評量的準則?
• Is there one or more objective(s) identified for State Goal 3: Student Performance?
對於國家的目標3:學生表現是否有一個或多個目標?
EXAMPLE FROM ALL STATE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
全國學校改進計劃範例
School Goal 1: All State School students make annual learning gains sufficient to acquire the knowledge, skills, and competencies needed to master state standards in the area of reading.
School Goal 1:所有公立學校學生進行年度的學習以獲得足夠的知識、技能和能力並符合該地區的閱讀標準。
School Goal 1 Objective 1:學生在標準課程得分需達Level 3或者是在2003 FCAT Sunshine State Standards 閱讀標準之上要增加50%以上。
School Goal 1 Objective 2: 59% or greater of the lowest 25% performing students on the 2002 FCAT Sunshine State Standards reading component will make adequate progress as determined by 2003 FCAT Sunshine State Standards reading component scores.
School Goal 1 Objective 2: 後25%的學生必須符合2002 FCAT 陽光標準中閱讀標準達59%以上,才能夠在2003年達適當進步。
2002 Reading Assessment
Sources of Data: School FCAT(理解評估測驗)and NRT Reading Results
District and State FCAT and NRT Reading Results
(see Appendix B for school data analysis worksheets)
1. Analyze the reading scores versus district and state results.
2. Calculate and record the differences (+ or -),“+” indicates performance is above or equal to district or state, “-” indicates performance is below district or state.
FCAT READING Sunshine State Standards
(All Curriculum Groups):

*Levels 3-5 are defined as meeting high standards
Year 2004 Levels 2-5 minimum scores increase (see Appendix C)
Which subtest(s) from the FCAT Sunshine State Standards reading component cover the most problematic areas for your school?
Subtest 1: Words/Phrases
Subtest 2: Main Idea/Purpose
Subtest 3: Comparisons
Subtest 4: Reference/Research
School Goal 1 Objective 3:比較全國學生在2003 FCAT陽光標準閱讀部分中的平均積分且須有所提升。
Input Evaluation
如何評鑑你的策略界定及溝通
A strategy identifies the action to be taken in order to achieve the objective. It is helpful to list strategies in priority order.
確定策略採取的行動,可幫助策略列出優先順序,以達到目標。
* be directly related to obtaining the stated objective;與既定目標有直接關係
* identify who is responsible, a timeline, all necessary resources for implementing the strategy; and確定誰來負責、期限、所有必要的資源及執行策略
* include a continuous evaluation process so ongoing adjustments can be made.
包含一個持續的評鑑過程,以便策略可以不斷的調整
• Questions that need to be answered when evaluating how well you communicated your strategies:
評估你的溝通策略
Are strategies clear and understandable?策略是否明確且容易了解?
• Do strategies clearly align with areas of need?策略是否明確?
• Are strategies identified that include special population needs?策略是否包含特殊族群的需求?
• Have you allocated human/material resources to implement strategies?人力及物力的分配
• Have you identified technical assistance and professional development needs and resources?技術援助及專業發展需求
• Have you set up timelines and checkpoints?建立期限及清單
• Have you identified evaluation methods for assessing progress?評估過程的評鑑方式
• Do you have a descriptive record of the implementation of each strategy?紀錄每次策略的實施
• Does your evaluation design include:評鑑設計包含:
• evaluating the process - assessing the implementation, 評鑑過程 - 評估實施
• evaluating the product - determining the success of each strategy implemented,
評鑑產出 - 確定每個戰略的成功實施
• a timeline, and期限
• someone who is responsible.負責人